William Faulkner’s short story Barn Burning is not his most celebrated work. However, it is a significant one because it precedes in time The Snopes Trilogy. Initially, William Faulkner intended to use the story as the opening chapter of The Hamlet. He rejects this idea, and the short story stands as a separate piece of literature.
In the article, you’ll see Barn Burning’s summary and analysis that will help you understand the story better.
Barn Burning: Summary
Barn Burning by William Faulkner is a deep and complicated short story. It starts with a court proceeding at a store, not a courthouse. In this proceeding, Abner Snopes is accused of burning his neighbor’s barn. Mr. Harris, the opponent of Abner, tells the Justice that on several occasions, Snopes’s hog broke through the fence and got into his fields. The last time it happened, Mr. Harris asked for a dollar in return. A man who went to get the hog told Mr. Harris that the barn and the corn could burn. That very same night, Mr. Harris lost his barn to fire. However, there is no real proof of who did it.
The only eyewitness is a ten-year-old boy, the son of Abner. His name is Colonel Sartoris Snopes. He is called by the Justice to answer the questions. He will have to testify against his father. He is ready to lie for his father. He sees them as his enemies and does not realize that Justice and Mr. Harris are being kind to him. They do not want to put Sarty in this position. Instead of pressuring the boy to testify against his father, the Justice dismisses the case. Nevertheless, he recommends Abner leave the country the very same day. Abner agrees to do that.
As Abner and his sons leave the store, someone harasses the father by calling him “a barn burner.” Sarty is ready to prove his loyalty to the family and wants to fight. The boy knocks down Sarty two times, and Sarty bleeds.
In the evening, the whole family packs their belongings into a wagon and leaves the city. In the middle of the night, Abner wakes Sartoris up to accuse the boy of being disloyal. He thinks that Sarty was on the verge of betraying the whole family. He strikes Sartoris and tells him that loyalty to the family is essential.
Later, the family arrives at their new home. The reader learns that it is not the first time when they had to move. They moved on a dozen occasions just in the last ten years. The writer does not explicitly explain why they did that. The reader also learns that the family will work on the land owned by Major de Spain. Abner despises the owner of the land because he is rich. The house of Major de Spain is described in great detail.
As soon as they arrive, Abner goes to De Spain. He steps into the horse poop on purpose just before entering the mansion. However, the owner is not at home. He goes into the center of the room and leaves dirty shoe marks on the blond rug. Miss Lula, the owner’s wife, asks them to leave. She is displeased with the guests. He leaves the house and remarks that all of it has been built by slaves.
Several hours later, the servant from the house brings the rug for cleaning. Abner orders his daughters to clean the carpet. However, the next morning, de Spain arrives early in the morning to tell them that the rug is ruined. Its replacement will cost one hundred dollars, and they will be additionally charged twenty extra bushels of corn. Sarty tries to defend his father, hoping it will help him.
The next several days, the whole family is busy with labor. On the weekend, Abner Snopes and his sons go to the country store again. They found De Spain in the store too. Sarty does not understand that his father tries to sue De Spain to have the fee of twenty bushels removed. However, the judge thinks that the rug was burned as well. He says that Snopes will have to pay ten extra bushels of corn when it is due.
When Snopes returns home, Abner hears his mother’s voice. She tries to stop Abner from doing something. However, he takes the kerosene from the lamp and orders Sartoris to get the oil. Sarty realized that his father wants to burn another barn. Sartoris agrees to do that but is dreaming of running away. Then, he tries to change his father’s mind. However, his attempts are useless.
Sartoris runs to the De Spain house to let them know about the barn. As Sartoris runs back to the barn, he hears three shots. He also sees the firelight from the burning barn. Snopes is dead, and Sartoris mourns. He does not know for sure if Abner is dead.
Sarty falls asleep and wakes up feeling better. He runs away into the dark woods without looking back.
Barn Burning Analysis
The Barn Burning setting of the first part of the short story is unknown. However, the events of the opening scene supposedly happen in the southern part of the United States. The second part of the story occurs in a fictional county of Yoknapatawpha in the state of Mississippi. Faulkner situated a lot of his works in this place.
The author is famous for his distinct literary style. In Faulkner’s Barn Burning, he uses long sentences that are interrupted by the clauses. It gives a sense of continuity to his works. It also adds complexity to Faulkner’s fiction. It creates a stream-of-consciousness style in which the characters’ thoughts are interrupted and shifted. The first paragraph is the perfect example of how Faulkner uses this technique.
The opening scene of the story focuses on the feelings and thoughts of a ten-year-old boy named Sarty. First, readers learn that he is hungry. He craves meat and cheese while standing at a store. The first paragraph describes his thoughts and physical sensations. His mind quickly shifts. He remembers the reason why he is in the country store. He has to testify against his father in a court hearing.
Young Sarty faces a choice: to be loyal to his father or stay faithful to what is right. He knows that his father burned the barn. However, he is ready to lie for him. The reader does not understand if it’s out of fear or out of love. Sarty’s impressions and feelings are loosely connected. The opening paragraph starts with the description of hunger and scents and ends up with the abstract sensations: guilt, fear, anger, and contradiction.
Sarty is convinced that Justice and Mr. Harris are his and his father’s enemies. He does not notice that they behave kindly with him as they demand honesty and decide to dismiss the case. Despite having a look into Sarty’s thoughts, Sarty cannot put his conflict in words. Nevertheless, the reader understands that he faces a difficult choice, and through his words, the audience understands the truth.
Throughout the story, Faulkner traced Sarty’s personal development. By the end of the story, Sarty’s self-awareness grows, and he can act out of his motives. The critics usually overlook the significance of Sarty as the main character. They focus on the father figure in the story. However, the subtle tracing of Sarty’s personal development is essential for understanding the story.
Barn Burning by Faulkner contains some of the modernist techniques and devices. The first one is his experimentation with consciousness. He uses the narrative voice to demonstrate Sarty’s limited understanding of his conflicts. Another method used by Faulkner is his experimentation with time.
The story takes place over one week. These events happened in the past, but Faulkner managed to create a sense of the present time. The reader might even assume that the narrator of the story is a grown-up Sarty. The reason for this assumption is that the readers see the events through Sarty’s eyes but do not get to hear his thoughts.
The narrative voice silences the pain and anger of Sarty and the other family members. For instance, when Abner hits Sarty, the narrator focuses on Abner and how he hurts his son. However, the narrator of the story is not Sarty; it is omniscient. We see the events through the eyes of Sarty, but he is not the narrator of the story. The boy is alienated from his family and his feelings. The reader is alienated from the main characters’ emotions, which we can view as a modernist technique.
The narrator uses advanced language which a ten years old boy would not use. It also possesses information Sarty does not know. For instance, Sarty wonders why his father does not make big fires when they camp. The narrator has information about Abner’s life that Sarty does not know, which proves that it is the third person. It creates tension because the narrator knows everything about each character. He does not sympathize with Sarty, nor he condemns Abner.
There are several essential conflicts in the story: the one between Abner and De Spain and Sarty’s internal dilemma. The central part of the story happens on De Spain’s plantation. The conflict between De Spain and Abner develops immediately. Mainly as a result of the father’s actions. Sarty’s internal conflict unveils throughout the story.
Thanks for reading! You can continue analyzing the story and write an essay on Barn Burning with the help of our topics and samples.